People v. Guzman
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.), rendered April 20, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree.
The pertinent facts surrounding this matter can be found in a decision by this court wherein we dismissed the petition in a CPLR article 78 proceeding commenced by defendant to prohibit the County Judge from refusing to accept his original guilty plea to a class B felony (see, Matter of Guzman v Harrigan, 158 AD2d 872). Defendant now argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to argue in that proceeding that the District Attorney should have been compelled to adhere to his original plea agreement which, defendant contends, included dismissal of three out of four indictments. As is evidenced by the record in this appeal and this court’s decision dismissing the petition in the article 78 proceeding (supra), dismissal of the indictments was never offered to defendant by the District Attorney; rather, the first plea was to be in satisfaction of all four indictments. Therefore,
Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.