People v. Garrett
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Howard E. Bell, J.), rendered December 1, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of imprisonment of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the court erred in denying both of his speedy trial motions. We agree
We have previously held that a presentation to the Grand Jury by a prosecutor not admitted to practice does not render the proceeding defective (CPL 210.35 [5]) or require dismissal of the indictment (People v Munoz, 153 AD2d 281, lv denied 77 NY2d 880; see also, People v Carter, 77 NY2d 95). Thus, there is no merit to defendant’s claim that since the prosecutor was not admitted, the People could not legitimately answer ready until the superseding indictment was filed. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.