MacMaster v. Sardina
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Mem
Finally, we do not address defendant Sardina’s contention that he was entitled to a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). That issue is raised for the first time on appeal and, therefore, is not properly before us. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — Reargument.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.