People v. Besana
Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the evidence, law and circumstances of this case, we find no merit to defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). Defendant further contends that the trial court’s request that he face the bench during trial violated his constitutional rights to present a defense and to be present during trial. Because defendant raised only a general objection when the court made its request, he failed to alert the trial court to his present contentions and failed to preserve those arguments for our review (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941, 942; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).
Defendant also contends that the trial court’s discharge of a sworn juror in his absence violated his constitutional right to
We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Easier, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.