People v. Hereida
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), rendered March 29,
Defendant’s plea allocution was adequate inasmuch as he admitted possession and dominion and control of narcotics in his codefendant’s apartment (People v Sierra, 45 NY2d 56, 60). In any event, his plea to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, a lesser included offense of one of the crimes charged in the indictment, served to forfeit his right to challenge the factual basis of the plea (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 108; People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950).
Further, we find that defendant’s sentence was not excessive. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.