Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992

Schmitt v. Perales

Schmitt v. Perales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1041; 593 N.Y.S.2d 486; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14148
Schmitt v. Perales

Opinion of the Court

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), we consider respondents’ contention that the petition should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction (see, Matter of Desmone v Blum, 99 AD2d 170; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 7804.09). Be*1042cause the notice of petition failed to set forth the time and place of the scheduled hearing on the petition, personal jurisdiction was not acquired over respondents and the petition should have been dismissed (see, Travis v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 185 AD2d 714; Matter of RECYCLE v Lacatena, 163 AD2d 693, 694). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.