Desa v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), rendered December 23,1991, upon a jury verdict, in favor of plaintiff against defendant, resulting in an award, as reduced by the court’s post-trial order entered June 11, 1991 and as stipulated to by plaintiff, of $2,845,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff established a
Finally, the IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in, inter alia, modifying that portion of the jury’s award for future pain and suffering by ordering a new trial on the issue of future pain and suffering unless plaintiff stipulated to a reduction of the $5 million award to $1 million. Since plaintiff stipulated to the entry of the reduced award, the cross appeal must be dismissed (CPLR 5511; Rumph v Gotham Ford, 44 AD2d 792, 792-793, lv denied 34 NY2d 519, appeal dismissed 34 NY2d 952). However, the matter is reviewable on appeal pursuant to defendant City’s appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [5]; supra, at 793). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.