Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992

People v. Skeffery

People v. Skeffery
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 29, 1992
188 A.D.2d 438; 591 N.Y.S.2d 1012; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14743
People v. Skeffery

Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered November 21, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and bail jumping in the first degree, and sentencing her to concurrent prison terms of 15 years to life and 1 year, respectively, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the possession count to 5 years to life, and otherwise affirmed.

*439While a sentence within the statutory limits ordinarily is not a cruel and unusual punishment (People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694, 697), "in some rare case[s]” the statute can be unconstitutionally applied (People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 119, cert denied 423 US 950). Noting the disparity of treatment arising from co-defendant’s acquittal at a separate trial based upon testimony that exculpated both, and lack of criminal record, age, poor health, and family circumstances, we reduce the sentence to 5 years to life to avoid the sentence being "cruel and unusual” in the circumstances (NY Const, art I, § 5; see, People v Andrews, 176 AD2d 530, 531-532, lv denied 79 NY2d 918).

We have reviewed defendant’s argument that the trial court abused its discretion in not permitting defense counsel to recall a prosecution witness after cross-examination of the witness had already been concluded, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Ventura, 35 NY2d 654). Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.