Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992

In re Ronald M.

In re Ronald M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1089; 593 N.Y.S.2d 471; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15072
In re Ronald M.

Opinion of the Court

Motion for permission to file late notice of appeal and for other relief denied with leave to renew. Memorandum: The motion papers are insufficient to determine whether the appeal was timely. This Court has discretion to permit late filing if the notice of appeal was timely served (see, CPLR 5520 [a]). It has no authority to extend the time for taking an appeal (see, Matter

*1090of Shannon H., 187 AD2d 1046). The time to appeal does not begin to run until service of the order appealed from with notice of entry (see, Family Ct Act ยง 1113). Respondent may renew his application, if necessary, upon a factual showing that the notice was timely served. Present โ€” Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.