In re Cass
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Allen Cass has submitted an affidavit dated October 14, 1992, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Cass was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on June 29, 1988, under the name D. A. Cass.
Mr. Cass indicates that he has no meritorious defense to any of the charges, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subject to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.
Mr. Cass further states that he is aware that any order issued pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (6-a) may direct him to make monetary restitution to any persons whose money or property was misappropriated or misapplied or to reimburse the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York and acknowledges the continuing jurisdiction of the Court to make such an order. He is aware that any order issued pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (6-a) may be entered as a civil judgment against him and he specifically waived his right to be heard in opposition thereto.
Counsel for the Grievance Committee recommends that the Court accept the resignation. Under the circumstances, the resignation of David Allen Cass as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. Accordingly, David Allen Cass is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.
Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the resignation of David Allen Cass is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, David Allen Cass is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that David Allen Cass shall promptly comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (6-a) (a), the respondent shall reimburse the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York for any awards made to the persons whose money or property he willfully misappropriated or misapplied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.