Jefferson Heights Quarry, Inc. v. Fort Pike Associates
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment ordered in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant PRP Construction, Inc. (PRP) for the sale of "large base and cap stone” to be used in the construction of a breakwater. Defendant Fort Pike Associates was the property owner and defendant Harmer-Hill General Contractors, Inc. (Harmer-Hill) was the subcontractor. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking payment for stone accepted by defendants, totalling $35,340.55, and defendants PRP and Fort Pike Associates counterclaimed, asserting that plaintiff breached the contract by delivering stone smaller than that required by the contract. After a trial, at which PRP agreed to assume any liability found against Harmer-Hill, the court denied relief to any party. That was error. Defendants accepted the stone and took control of it by using it to build the breakwater; defen
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.