Welton Becket Associates v. LLJV Development Corp.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered on or about August 10, 1992, which in relevant part denied petitioners’ motion for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that the interrogatories it left standing are material and necessary to the issue of alter ego and successor liability framed for the purpose of determining the proper parties to the arbitration (see, Daval Steel Prods. v M/V Fakredine, 951 F2d 1357, 1367; Lumbard v Maglia, Inc., 621 F Supp 1529, 1535). The ten-year period covered by the *478interrogatories is appropriate, going back as it does to when petitioners first solicited the work from respondents and ending near the time when petitioners finished the project.

While some of the interrogatories on the framed issue may call for information relevant to the merits of the arbitration, the "overlap” is minor and does not warrant striking interrogatories that are highly relevant to the framed issue.

We have considered petitioners’ other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.