Clasen v. Clasen
Opinion of the Court
In a matrimonial action in which the parties
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, no hearing was required (see, Domestic Relations Law §§ 244, 238; cf., Petritis v Petritis, 131 AD2d 651; Friedman v Exel, 116 AD2d 433). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.