Handler v. D'Ambrosio
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered August 31, 1992 in Montgomery County, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5239, to determine petitioner’s rights to certain funds in possession of respondent Montgomery County Sheriff.
In October 1991, petitioner obtained a judgment against respondent Robert Seibert in the amount of $28,200. On December 19, 1991, petitioner’s attorney filed a property
We reject petitioner’s principal argument that the Sheriff may not levy on funds collected on behalf of petitioner to enforce respondent’s execution against petitioner and, accordingly, affirm. Petitioner has offered no persuasive reason why the Sheriff may not levy on such funds to enforce respondent’s execution (see, CPLR 105 [i]; 5232) and Matter of Baker v Kenworthy (41 NY 215), although holding to the contrary, was decided under a different statutory scheme and, in our view, should not be followed (see, McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C105:4, at 41). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been considered and rejected.
Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.