In re the Claim of Chiaramonte
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unem
The conclusion by the Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment because he did not want to work in his reassigned duties is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld. Claimant never expressed his dissatisfaction with his new duties to the proper employer representative in charge of such matters and never requested a transfer back to his former duties. Furthermore, the determination that claimant made a willful misrepresentation to obtain unemployment insurance benefits is also supported by substantial evidence.
Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.