Camperlino v. Dimovich Construction Corp.
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The court erred in awarding plaintiff damages for lost profits based on defendants’ breach of contract for the sale of real property. Such damages are available for the failure to convey real property pursuant to a contract in cases of bad faith or willful disregard of the contract (see, BSL Dev. Corp. v Broad Cove, 178 AD2d 394, 395; Mokar Props. Corp. v Hall, 6 AD2d 536, 539; see also, 91 NY Jur 2d, Real Property Sales and Exchanges, § 188). Plaintiff asserted five causes of action in its amended complaint, including breach of contract, conspiracy to defraud, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiff sought and was granted summary judgment only on its cause of action for breach of contract. That cause of action alleged that defendants "refused” to convey the property pursuant to the contract; neither bad faith nor willful disregard of the contract was alleged. The judgment on appeal resulted from a hearing on
Present —Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.