People v. Wyne
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), rendered November 2, 1992, convicting him of custodial interference in the first degree and criminal contempt in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree.
Before he abducted the children, the defendant’s custody dispute with his wife had been the subject of legal proceedings in the Supreme Court, Queens County. An order had been made during the course of these proceedings and the evidence establishes beyond any reasonable doubt that all parties, including the defendant, understood that the order granted custody pendente lite to the defendant’s wife. The evidence was thus legally sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that the defendant’s abduction of his children constituted an "[i]ntentional disobedience or resistance to the lawful process or other mandate of’ the court (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.