Citibank (N.Y.S.) v. Gorgoni
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted summary
Plaintiff is not estopped from declaring a default because defendants’ reliance on the workout arrangement after November 1991 was misplaced. Plaintiff did nothing after it demanded payment of all delinquencies to indicate that the workout arrangement was still in effect.
There is no merit to the defense that defendants offered to pay the full delinquency prior to acceleration of the mortgage. The evidence establishes only that defendants offered to bring the delinquency to 30 days.
The 1989 consolidation agreement "modified, consolidated and combined” a 1986 note and another mortgage and provided the terms of default, and thus plaintiff was not bound by the default provisions of the 1986 note.
Defendants’ remaining defenses and counterclaims based on fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duties, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, prima facie tort and deceptive acts were properly dismissed. Defendants set forth no facts that establish that plaintiff acted improperly in its dealings with defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.