Wyndham Co. v. Wyndham Hotel Co.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered February 18, 1993, which, inter alia, denied that branch of the Wyndham defendants’ motion as sought summary judgment and granted that branch as sought a severance of the first and second causes of action, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to deny the severance, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
We agree with the IAS Court that the lease, read as a whole, supports plaintiff hotel lessee’s contention that it was to have exclusive use of the hotel name "Wyndham” during the life of the lease (see, Shubert v Columbia Pictures Corp., 189 Misc 734, affd 274 App Div 751), and that plaintiffs therefore have standing to assert a common-law trademark infringement of that name. We disagree, however, that the two causes of action set forth in the complaint are so unrelated as to warrant a severance.
The first cause of action is directed at plaintiffs’ competitors who, since on or about 1982, commenced operation of a chain of hotels throughout the United States and Caribbean under
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.