In re Schechterman
Opinion of the Court
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on November 17, 1980. He has maintained an office for the practice of law in Florida, where he was admitted in 1983.
By order dated November 10, 1993, the Supreme Court of Florida granted a petition for emergency suspension of respondent filed by the Florida Bar.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, has moved pursuant to section 806.19 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.19) for an order reciprocally disciplining respondent.
Based upon the emergency suspension imposed by the Supreme Court of Florida, the serious allegations of substantial trust fund shortages and misappropriation contained in the petition for emergency suspension, and respondent’s admission to trust account shortages in his response to the petition, we find that respondent is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest. Based upon such finding, we conclude that respondent should be suspended until the disciplinary matter in Florida is concluded and until further order of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 806.4 [f]). We also note respondent’s consent to such interim suspension.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Peters, JJ.,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.