People v. Fitzpatrick
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant contends that his conviction of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. We agree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we conclude that the People failed to establish that defendant restrained the Police Chief (see, Penal Law § 135.00 [1]; § 135.10). Thus, we
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.