Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994

Badea v. Seneca Insurance

Badea v. Seneca Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 98; 612 N.Y.S.2d 839; 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3765
Badea v. Seneca Insurance

Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about June 30, 1993, which, inter alia, denied defendant and third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In light of the fact that the evidence presented on the motion raises material questions concerning, inter alia, whether the instant fire extinguisher was properly installed and situated in the premises and as to what caused the extinguisher to fall, summary judgment was properly denied. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.