People v. Zhang Wan
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered September 23, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts), robbery in the second degree (three counts), burglary in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the hearing court erred in
The defendant failed to preserve his claim regarding translation problems with the court appointed interpreter. In any event, his contention that he was unable to understand or participate in the proceedings or that he was deprived of a fair trial because he could not understand the interpreter finds no support in the record (see, People v Gordillo, 191 AD2d 455; People v Ko, 133 AD2d 850).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.