In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & Glaude
Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on or about June 16, 1993 which, inter alia, ordered and adjudged that State Farm was the insurer of the alleged uninsured motor vehicle owned by a non-party to this proceeding, unanimously reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs.
In a proceeding to determine an uninsured motorist claim, proof of insurance offered by a claimant’s insurer in the form of a Department of Motor Vehicles DP-37 form ("DMV DP-
The hearing court erred when it deemed introduction of the DMV DP-37 by claimant’s insurer conclusive evidence of coverage, thereby failing to properly credit the disclaiming company’s rebuttal evidence that an exhaustive search was made and no policy could be located. Claimant’s insurer’s failure to meet its burden of coming forward with additional evidence to demonstrate that a policy of insurance was issued for the offending vehicle should have resulted in a finding in favor of State Farm, the disclaiming company, on this issue. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.