Neildan Construction Corp. v. Angona
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to quiet
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The third-party defendant was entitled to rely upon the facially valid power of attorney in this case since the circumstances surrounding its presentation would not have put a reasonable person on notice that something was amiss (see, Grasso v Fiumara, 167 AD2d 510; cf., Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co., 63 NY2d 827). Thus, the Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the third-party complaint. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.