Lu v. Rosa
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover a down payment tendered pursuant to a contract of sale of a franchise, the plaintiff
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff failed to raise any triable issues of fact as to whether he satisfied all the conditions precedent to cancellation of the contract of sale and entitlement to recovery of the down payment (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.