People v. Sanchez
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The record of the reconstruction hearing (see, People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337) establishes that defendant was not present in chambers at the Ventimiglia conference. At that conference, the trial court ruled that the People could introduce that part of defendant’s statement admitting a prior uncharged drug sale if defendant raised the defenses of agency or entrapment or attacked the voluntariness of the statement. Reversal is required because defendant was denied her right to be present at a material stage of the trial (see, People v Snell, 203 AD2d 933; People v Spotford, 196 AD2d 179, lv granted 83 NY2d 915).
We reject the People’s contention that defendant’s presence at the Ventimiglia hearing would have been superfluous. The outcome of the proceeding was not "wholly favorable” to
We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. In view of our decision, we do not reach defendant’s remaining contention. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.