Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994

Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Hartford Insurance

Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Hartford Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 23, 1994
210 A.D.2d 970; 621 N.Y.S.2d 967; 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13459
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Hartford Insurance

Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. Defendant failed to meet its initial burden of showing that plaintiff’s employee, Emmett Turner, was a seaman within the meaning of the Jones Act (46 USC, Appendix § 688), and thus failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Salgado v Rudolph Corp., 514 F2d 750, 755; Harney v Moore Bldg. Corp., 359 F2d 649, 654). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Declaratory Judgment.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.