People v. Cordero
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings
Ordered that the sentences and amended sentence are affirmed.
The sentence imposed on April 28, 1992, was the minimum for the defendant’s conviction of a class C felony as a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3], [4]). In addition, the sentence imposed on August 20, 1992, was the result of a negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).
As to the amended sentence imposed on July 14, 1992, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that it is harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.