Reid v. Coughlin
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered January 3, 1994 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty after a Superintendent’s hearing
We find petitioner’s contention that his mail was unconstitutionally censored to be without merit. Departmental regulations provide for the opening and return of outgoing mail which does not have a disbursement form attached. Further, pursuant to regulation incoming mail is subject to inspection for contraband. Respondents’ interpretation of its regulation allowing for inspection of incoming mail as applicable in this case is rational given the real possibility that inmates could use such improperly prepared mail to transfer contraband internally through the use of a false return address. We also find that respondents’ actions did not violate petitioner’s 1st Amendment rights as they were reasonably related to the legitimate penalogical goal of maintaining security. We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.