O'Connor v. Kelly
Opinion of the Court
Determination of respon
Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner violated departmental guidelines by failing to perceive the substantial risk of injury to his partner when he leaned over his partner and discharged his weapon while sitting in the patrol car (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181). Considering the substantial risk of injury created by petitioner’s actions, the penalty imposed does not shock one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.