In re Jorge F.
Opinion of the Court
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Richard N. Ross, J.), entered September 20, 1994, which modified an earlier order
We affirm the adjudication of delinquency and the factual findings made by Family Court as fully supported by the record.
However, since the stay of that aspect of Family Court’s disposition requiring confinement for one year in a secure facility, issued by Justice Kupferman on September 27, 1993, we note that respondent has made considerable progress toward rehabilitation in the less constrictive setting where he has been receiving treatment, and that this type of placement has proved to be more in conformity with the "least restrictive available alternative * * * consistent with the needs and best interests of the respondent and the need for protection of the community” mandated by Family Court Act § 352.2 (2) (a). To insist, after the 2 Vi year lapse of time presented here, that the harsher alternative now be imposed would, in our view, constitute an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Cecil L., 71 AD2d 917, Iv dismissed 48 NY2d 755; Matter of John H., 48 AD2d 879), and we modify accordingly. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.