Friedman v. McGinity
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner failed to plead or prove the existence of practical difficulties demonstrating that he cannot utilize his property or the structure in question without coming into conflict with the zoning ordinance. The respondent, therefore, properly denied his application to amend a previously granted area variance (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441). Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.