In re the Claim of Constantino
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the
Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left his position as a press operator without good cause. Claimant was upset when his employer changed the hours of his shift and, as a result, quit his job. While claimant asserts that he had to leave his employment because the shift change made it impossible for him to take care of his disabled brother, there was evidence that claimant failed to make mention of family responsibilities at the time he quit and that there were other family members who could provide assistance. Accordingly, the Board’s decision must be upheld.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.