People v. Morales
Opinion of the Court
Judgment,
Defendant’s claim the court erred in closing the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officer is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, defendant having failed to object when the court, after conducting a Hinton hearing sought by the codefendant but not defendant, granted the People’s application for closure (CPL 470.05 [2]; see, People v Neiblas, 213 AD2d 498; People v Carter, 162 AD2d 218, lv denied 76 NY2d 984), and we decline to review the issue in the interest of justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.