People v. Edmonds
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the court properly concluded that certain fingerprint evidence was admissible under the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule (see, e.g., People v Stith, 69 NY2d 313; People v Fitzpatrick, 32 NY2d 499, 508-509, cert denied 414 US 1033, 1050; People v Watson, 188 AD2d 501, 502). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.