People v. Majid
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of grand larceny in the second degree (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, the contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish his guilt of grand larceny in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Specifically, the overwhelming evi
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.