People v. Oglesby
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez, 127 AD2d 790; People v Reding, 167 AD2d 716). In any event, any error was harmless (see, People v Hernandez, supra; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).
The defendant’s remaining contentions regarding the court’s charge to the jury, and the alleged admission of hearsay testimony, are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245; People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26; People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836; People v Fleming, 70 NY2d 947; People v Williams, 70 NY2d 946) and, in any event, without merit. Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.