People v. Person
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the prosecution failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence that he knowingly possessed more than 500 milligrams of cocaine (see, Penal Law § 220.06 [5]; see also, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Ryan, 82 NY2d 497), and we decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Smith, 217 AD2d 565; People v Oakman, 215 AD2d 596; People v St. Hill, 215 AD2d 510; People v Lawrence, 212 AD2d 638; People v Bright, 210 AD2d 244). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Noble, 86 NY2d 814; see also, People v Cruz, 197 AD2d 630; People v Ward, 191 AD2d 661). We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.