Marchione v. Cordero
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), dated July 28, 1994, which granted the defendant Anthony Cordero’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff brought this personal injury action against the
We agree with the plaintiff that on the defendant Cordero’s motion for summary judgment she was free to submit additional evidence to Supreme Court concerning injuries allegedly suffered as a result of the underlying accident which required surgery after the defendant Battaglia’s appeal was filed. However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff was insufficient to make out a prima facie case that she suffered serious injury. The doctor’s reports submitted by her were unsworn, and therefore were insufficient to defeat Cordero’s motion (see, Grasso v Angerami, 79 NY2d 813; Marsh v Wolfson, 186 AD2d 115). Thus, Cordero’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted (see, Marchione v Battaglia, supra). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.