Taylor v. T & G Concrete Pumping Service Co.
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and third-party complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have denied the motion of third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint. A complaint should not be dismissed at the close of the proof unless the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff and given the benefit of all inferences that may be drawn therefrom, does not provide any rational basis for a jury to find in plaintiff’s favor (see, Blum v Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 NY 241, 245; Santiago v Steinway Trucking, 97 AD2d 753).
The record shows that plaintiff’s decedent was killed when
Third-party defendant’s reliance on Ruszkowski v Sears, Roebuck & Co. (188 AD2d 967, lv denied 82 NY2d 654) is misplaced because third-party plaintiff does not rest its claim on the negligent conduct of decedent. (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Corning, J.—Dismiss Third-Party Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.