Conboy v. Dinkins
Opinion of the Court
—Order and judg
Petitioners maintain that when they exercised their option pursuant to chapter 666 of the Laws of 1990 to transfer their membership from the Police Pension Fund to the retirement system of a second public employer and agreed to cessation of their police pensions until retirement from that second employment, they did not waive their entitlement to Variable Supplements Fund benefits and City héalth insurance coverage. However, we find that because petitioners no longer receive police pensions, they no longer satisfy the definition of "eligible pension fund beneficiary” so as to qualify for Variable Supplements Fund benefits and they no longer satisfy the definition of "City retiree” so as to qualify for health insurance coverage from the city. Deference must be given to an agency’s construction of statutes which the agency administers if such construction is not irrational (Matter of Howard v Wyman, 28 NY2d 434, 438; Matter of Caruso v Ward, 160 AD2d 557, lv denied 76 NY2d 704). Respondents’ interpretation in this matter has a rational basis. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ. .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.