People v. Salim
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Alves (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. Salim (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered June 16, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, criminal possession of a forgery device, and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that he was not properly adjudicated a second felony offender (see, People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961; People v DeGroat, 203 AD2d 378). In any event, he waived this issue (see, CPL 400.21; People v Hewitt, 97 AD2d 828; People v Quattrocchi, 121 AD2d 479). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.