In re the Claim of Fumia
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Collen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- In re the Claim of Klein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- In re the Claim of Kunzler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- In re the Claim of Ormerod (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 1994, which ruled that claim
Claimant resigned from his position as an underwriter for a mortgage company because he felt his employer engaged in unprofessional practices and he could no longer tolerate the stress associated with the job. The Board denied his application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Upon review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Claimant’s employer did not direct him to do anything illegal or in violation of applicable regulations. Moreover, claimant failed to substantiate his claim that his doctor advised him to resign from his position for health reasons. We have considered claimant’s contention that he was denied the opportunity to present his doctor as a witness at the hearing and find it to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.