Russell v. Clute
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to, inter alia, prohibit respondents from disqualifying petitioner William E.. Russell from representing petitioner Frank L. Lovely, Jr. and other criminal defendants in Clinton County.
Petitioner William E. Russell is an attorney with offices in
Petitioners urge that County Court acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction when it entertained and granted the motion to disqualify Russell. We agree. County Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and may act only as provided by the provisions of the NY Constitution or by act of the Legislature within the limitations of the Constitution (see, NY Const, art VI, § 11; People ex rel. Dold v Martin, 284 App Div 127, 130). Respondents urge that the Legislature granted County Court power to act in preliminary matters in a local criminal court matter, which is true (see, CPL 10.10 [3] [g]). However, in that regard the Legislature has limited such matters to conducting arraignments and issuing warrants of arrest and search warrants (see, CPL 10.20 [3] [a]-[c]). Inasmuch as County Court’s action in the case at bar did not fall within any of the enumerated circumstances under which it could sit as a local criminal court, it was without jurisdiction to act as it did.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is granted to the extent that respondent Clinton County Judge is prohibited from disqualifying petitioner William E. Russell from representing petitioner Frank L. Lovely, Jr.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.