People v. Eldridge
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03), defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial based upon the People’s failure to provide him with Rosario material (see, People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940). We agree.
At trial, the principal prosecution witness testified that she purchased crack cocaine from defendant at his home for $20. She further testified that, within minutes, she made another $20 purchase of crack cocaine from an address directly across the street from defendant’s apartment. Both sales were the subject of Grand Jury proceedings. The People provided defendant with a transcript of the testimony of the witness before the Grand Jury in the instant case, but refused to produce her testimony at the Grand Jury proceeding involving the second sale.
In view of our resolution, we do not address defendant’s remaining contentions. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.