Jack's Insulation Contracting Corp. v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Determination of the respondent Environmental Control Board dated March 16, 1994, finding that petitioners
Petitioners’ argument that the testimony of respondents’ witnesses reveals gaps in their work procedures suggesting that they confused petitioners’ bags of waste with those left by someone else at the disposal site raised an issue of credibility that is to be resolved by the Administrative Law Judge (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). Once the credibility of respondents’ witnesses is accepted, the determination is clearly supported by substantial evidence. We have considered petitioners’ argument that the penalties were unlawful or an abuse of discretion and find it to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.