Raven Elevator Corp. v. Finkelstein
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ciena Capital Funding, LLC v. Krieg's, Inc. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017)
- Signature Fin. LLC v. Garber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Signature Fin. LLC v. Garber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Chip Fifth Ave. LLC v. Quality King Distribs., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Royal Equities Operating, LLC v. Rubin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Royal Equities Operating, LLC v. Rubin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- County of Greene v. Chalifoux (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Ameritel Management, Inc. v. Tanvir (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Hyman v. Golio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- International Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Lacher (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- International Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Lacher (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- 627 Acquisition Co., LLC v. 627 Greenwich, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Tosapratt, LLC v. Sunset Properties, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- MF Global, Inc. v. Morgan Fuel & Heating Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Sterling National Bank v. Biaggi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Madison Avenue Leasehold, LLC v. Madison Bentley Associates LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Famolaro v. Crest Offset, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- E.D.S. Security Systems, Inc. v. Allyn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Sacco v. Sutera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Gangi v. Solgar Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered on or about July 13, 1994, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as against defendant Finkelstein and judgment, same court and Justice, entered August 5, 1994, which awarded plaintiff $220,000 as against said defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court, in granting summary judgment, properly determined that defendant-appellant Finkelstein, as the guarantor of the promissory note issued by defendant Concord, had waived the defense of fraud in the inducement of the underlying agreement and the guarantee. Appellant is barred from asserting the defense as a matter of law based upon the absolute and unconditional disclaimer and waiver contained in the personal guarantee which specifically precluded the guarantor from raising any defenses or counterclaims relating to the underlying debt (Citibank v Plapinger, 66 NY2d 90, 94-95; Chase Manhattan Bank v Goldberger, 199 AD2d 97).
Finally, the liability of the guarantor may be broader than and exceed the scope of that of the principal where the guarantee, which is a separate undertaking, is, by its unqualified language, enforceable against the guarantor (European Am. Bank v Lofrese, 182 AD2d 67, 74; Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v Green, 95 AD2d 737, appeal dismissed 61 NY2d 760). Thus, the IAS Court properly granted that branch of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendant Finkelstein for the entire amount due and owing on the promissory note, since the guarantee specifically provided that, upon default, the guarantor was liable to pay "[t]he entire outstanding principal amount of the Note, together with any costs (including reasonable attorneys fees and expenses) incurred by the holder of the Note in connection with such nonpayment”.
We have reviewed defendant-appellant Finkelstein’s remain
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.