People v. Overton
Opinion of the Court
Judgment,
The police had reasonable suspicion that defendant had a gun when they observed a holster protruding from his jacket as well as a bullet-proof vest, walkie-talkie and what appeared to be a detective’s shield (see, People v Matos, 191 AD2d 232, lv denied 81 NY2d 1016; People v Lugo, 177 AD2d 427, lv denied 79 NY2d 949). The police were therefore justified in conducting a minimally intrusive touching of the holster, to determine if there was a gun inside, when defendant responded, when asked, that he was not a police officer (see, People v Taveras, 207 AD2d 306, lv denied 84 NY2d 940). Defendant’s claim that his bargained-for sentence, which was only slightly above the minimum permitted by law, should be reduced as excessive, is utterly without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.