People v. Davis
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme
The trial court provided defendant with an adequate opportunity to confer with defense counsel immediately before the parties began to exercise their challenges to a panel of prospective jurors. Under the circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion by setting a reasonable limit on the amount of time for defendant and counsel to confer (see, People v De Jesus, 42 NY2d 519, 523). We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.